Wonderful, I’m saying to myself as I read along. But then the shoe drops:
The department also benefited from an increase in federal subsidies, which offset meal prices for poor families.
About 57 percent of students qualified for free or reduced-price lunches in 2012, according to district figures.
Last year, $25.7 million, or 73 percent, of the program’s revenue came from the federal government. In 2007, the figure was 64 percent.
“I know it appears that the program is benefiting from the fact that more children qualify for these meals,” Henry said. “But the way I see it, we’re able to provide meals for students who couldn’t afford it otherwise.”
School leaders expect those revenues to increase again this year. The school system recently qualified for an increase in the amount of federal money it gets for each meal. More families applied for subsidized meals after the district started limiting meal charges last year.
“Children are now on their parents to get the forms in because they can’t get the chips and extra stuff if they owe money,” said Sharon McCants, principal of Kiser Middle. “And they are not a fan of the alternative (meals).”
........As you post your comment, please conform to Piedmont Publius's simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. If you wouldn't say it to a co-worker in front of your boss, it probably is not civil and respectful. We will delete any comment that fails this test and issue a warning to the poster. A second offense will result in a ban on commenting on this site. In sum, disagreements, arguments even, are welcome; abusive behavior is not. Thanks.