I realized it was the prerogative to dismiss charges against state Rep. Larry Womble in the fatal head-on crash that killed Winston-Salem resident David Carmichael, considering the fact there were no aggravating circumstances—i.e. alcohol or drugs in Womble’s system.
But —call me a conspiracy nut —– I found it interesting that the basis for the dismissal was an 180-degree turn on original accident investigation — that it was actually Carmichael who crossed the center line and hit Womble head-on instead of the other way around, as Winston-Salem police initially determined.
But Chief Scott Cunningham is standing behind the original findings:
Cunningham responded to questions about the investigation Wednesday at a monthly law-enforcement press conference.
“The initial investigation was not wrong,” he said. “I stand by the investigation we did.”
He said the decision to drop the charge is a prosecutor’s prerogative and stressed that his department is not at-tempting to have the case reopened.
His intent, he said afterwards, was simply to let citizens know that the police department “acted competently, professionally and consistent with the highest ethical standards.”
Important to point out that Carmichael had a blood-alcohol content of .29 at the time of the crash. Bar receipts in Carmichael’s pocket indicated that he had been drinking at a commercial establishment downtown before the crash. So it seems to me that –if indeed Carmichael is at fault —- that legal action is warranted against those establishments. It will be interesting to see if Womble pursues such legal action.
........As you post your comment, please conform to Piedmont Publius's simple comment policy: we welcome all perspectives, but require that comments be both civil and respectful. If you wouldn't say it to a co-worker in front of your boss, it probably is not civil and respectful. We will delete any comment that fails this test and issue a warning to the poster. A second offense will result in a ban on commenting on this site. In sum, disagreements, arguments even, are welcome; abusive behavior is not. Thanks.